Will an accident investigation be performed for my Michigan DUI arrest? Can it hurt or help my case?3/1/2016
Accident investigations are usually conducted in cases where there has been a serious injury or death. The accident investigator is typically a highly trained police officer who takes careful measurements and prepares an extensive report replete with diagrams, calculations, and conclusions.
All accident investigation reports should be reviewed by an independent accident investigator, who is often a retired police officer, an engineer, or a physicist who specializes in accident reconstruction. Expert opinions may differ, and there is always the chance that there is some prejudice and an attempt to place the blame in an accident on the drinking driver and to exonerate the sober victim. After all, it is often forgotten in these cases that most accidents, injury accidents, and fatal car crashes are not alcohol- or drug-related. The calculations used in accident reconstruction are often beyond the scope of the nonprofessional. However, using a calculator and common sense will often uncover prejudices that can be easily demonstrated to a jury. Recent Michigan court decisions have impacted how chemical test results are handled in terms of admissibility, but the Wager and Campbell decisions have not really impacted the is single-car accidents. It would appear that the prosecution will have to establish a time of the operation of the motor vehicle to make any test relevant. These types of cases are potentially ripe for suppression of test results if the prosecutor can't show when the accident occurred/driving took place. Despite this common sense, courts in Michigan are still hesitant to jump on this bandwagon.
MCL 257.625a(6)(a) provides that the amount of alcohol or the presence of a controlled substance as shown by chemical analysis is “presumed to be the same as at the time the person operated the vehicle.” If the prosecutor can't show when you drove the car, it will be difficult to show the relevancy of test results. The presumption as to the “relation back” of test results to the time of operation is also present in the Michigan jury instructions. The statutory presumption and accompanying jury instruction provide one of the most problematic aspects of the trial of a drunk driving case. The statute and the jury instructions pit the prosecutor’s burden of proof of beyond a reasonable doubt against a presumption that seems to improperly shift that burden. If you have a single-car accident case where the time of operation is unclear or frankly unknown, you could potentially have your chemical test suppressed if handled in the proper fashion. |
Click to Email Me Categories
All
|
Ann Arbor Office LocationPlymouth Office Location |
Representing DUI Clients in MichiganRepresenting clients charged with a DUI in Ann Arbor, Canton, Brighton, Howell, Saline, Adrian, Taylor, Plymouth, Northville, Westland, Ypsilanti, Pittsfield Towsnhip, Warren, Sterling Heights, Farmington, Pontiac, Romulus, Lansing, Novi, South Lyon, Southfield, Birmingham, Bloomfield Hills, Royal Oak, Troy, Rochester, Jackson, East Lansing, Garden City, Livonia, Dearborn, Detroit, St Clair Shores, Hazel Park, Ferndale, Madison Heights, Waterford, Milford, Shelby Township Clarkston, Oak Park, Berkley, Fraser, Sterling Heights, Clinton Township and others throughout Washtenaw, Wayne, Monroe, Jackson, Genesee, Macomb, Ingham, Lenawee, Livingston and Oakland County.
|