Arrested for DUI Second Offense at the 35th District Court in Plymouth Michigan

Julia was driving home from her friend's party late at night when she was pulled over for speeding. She knew she had had a few drinks, but she felt fine to drive. However, the officer who stopped her smelled alcohol on her breath and asked her to take a PBT test. Julia blew a 0.14 on the test, which was well above the legal limit in Michigan.

The officer then asked Julia to perform field sobriety tests. She stumbled a bit during the tests, but she thought she had done well enough. However, the officer was not convinced and placed her under arrest for drunk driving. Julia was taken to the 35th District Court, where she was charged with Operating While Intoxicated (OWI).

This was not the first time Julia had run into trouble with the law. She had a prior criminal conviction within the past seven years, which made her situation even more serious. However, she was determined to fight the charges and hired attorney Jonathan Paul, a former prosecutor who was known for his proactive defense approach.

Julia's case was complicated by the fact that she had also had a blood draw, which showed her blood alcohol concentration (BAC) to be 0.15, even higher than the PBT test had indicated. However, Julia had refused to take the test, triggering Michigan's implied consent law. This meant that her driver's license would be automatically suspended for a year, regardless of the outcome of her case unless Jonathan was able to win the implied consent case, or obtain a hardship license from the circuit court. 

Jonathan Paul advised Julia to take a proactive approach to her case. He knew that the prosecutor and judge would not be sympathetic to her if she simply pleaded guilty and threw herself at their mercy. Instead, he advised Julia to do everything she could to earn their empathy and compassion.
Julia knew that she had a lot of work to do if she wanted to make a good impression on the court. She was a nurse, and she decided to use her profession to her advantage. She started volunteering at a local hospital, helping out with patient care and showing her dedication to her job. She also enrolled in a rehabilitation program to show that she was taking responsibility for her actions and was committed to staying sober.

When Julia appeared in court three weeks later, she was nervous but confident. She had done everything she could to prepare for her case, and she hoped that her efforts would pay off. Jonathan Paul presented her case to the judge, emphasizing Julia's remorse for her actions and her commitment to rehabilitation.

The prosecutor was initially skeptical of Julia's defense, but as she listened to Jonathan Paul's arguments, she began to see Julia in a more positive light. She was impressed by Julia's dedication to her job and her commitment to sobriety. She agreed to reduce the charges against Julia to a lesser offense, which carried a less severe penalty.
​
Julia was relieved and grateful for the outcome of her case. She knew that she had made a mistake, but she was determined to learn from it and move forward with her life. With the help of Jonathan Paul and her own hard work, she was able to earn the empathy and compassion of the court and obtain the best possible result.